A Conversation I had at CSN Concert about
Peace
An
interesting conversation occurred as I was working the Veterans For Peace (VFP)
table at the Crosby, Stills and Nash concert. The fact that there was a VFP
table at the concert of a popular musical group is an important part of the
story – CSN has a long history of supporting the peace movement. They have
written and regularly perform songs, which are explicitly anti-war, and
improvise still more anti-war sentiments into songs – for example during
“Wooden Ships” when the lyrics ask about the war “who won?” David would respond
“no one!” These leanings are not news to any of us who have followed the band
whether you include their political actions off stage or not, which is why the
conversation is “noteworthy”.
If anyone doubts
the feelings of CSN towards peace, I had a personal piece of feedback. Prior to
the concert, my wife and I were in back of the venue waiting to find where we
would be with the VFP table. Of course I was decked out in my VFP t-shirt and
hat for the occasion. Graham Nash came out of the back door ambling leisurely
towards the tour buses. He noticed my attire and actually said “nice shirt” –
thereby expressing his approval of the peace message. I had brought markers
just in case I would meet a band member, and was so star struck I just stood
there – didn’t even say thanks. Not one of my prouder moments – no memento to
prominently display for me.
At
a concert where the band has a long history of being pro-peace, and where the
fans are therefore primarily pro-peace or at the very least ok with that
message, you just know there is going to be a few vocal exceptions. Sure
enough, when anti-war sentiments or songs came up, there would be audience
members who would shout things like “rock and roll” or “play the music” but
they were pretty much drowned out by supporters of the band’s message.
At the breaks, my
job at the table was to engage as many people as possible who were walking past
and spread the message to those unfamiliar with VFP, and network with those who
are supportive but perhaps not active. We offered materials like buttons,
bumper stickers, DVDs, etc., which were not “for sale” but we had a donation
basket on display and the vast majority get the hint – it’s free, but we gladly
accept voluntary donations.
One of the vocal
opponents of the peace message was apparently dying to engage in debate, and
chose to do so by bragging about his employment with a local prominent defense
contractor where “I make devices that save our troops.” Typically I avoid
engagement – you cant convert someone who depends on war to make their living,
but with so many people around it did not feel right to just not respond. So I
told him I worked for an organization that would eliminate the need to “protect
our troops” as they would not be at war in the first place.
I found my verbal
sparring partner’s response quite interesting “what would you do about our enemies?”
This was so interesting I asked for more information – “who exactly are our
enemies?” This is where his verbal assault began to fall apart – he kept
repeating about “dealing with our enemies” and “we have to face our enemies”
but I would simply repeat, “who are our enemies?”
I find this
interesting because this is the question in war – who are our enemies and why
are our enemies? Those of us know history can see that most often we create our
enemies, they are whoever we have so deeply offended that they feel there is no
way out but to attack us. So if that is the case – we cannot hope to win by
going to war. We simply create more enemies; our future enemies are the family
and friends of the enemies we kill today.